{"id":1263,"date":"2026-05-07T05:00:06","date_gmt":"2026-05-07T05:00:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/banking.deepdigitalventures.com\/blog\/?p=1263"},"modified":"2026-05-07T05:00:06","modified_gmt":"2026-05-07T05:00:06","slug":"the-difference-between-cet1-tier-1-and-total-risk-based-capital","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/banking.deepdigitalventures.com\/blog\/the-difference-between-cet1-tier-1-and-total-risk-based-capital\/","title":{"rendered":"The Difference Between CET1, Tier 1, and Total Risk-Based Capital"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Answer first:<\/strong> Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) is the narrowest and usually highest-quality risk-based capital ratio. Tier 1 capital is broader because it adds qualifying additional Tier 1 instruments. Total risk-based capital is broader again because it adds qualifying Tier 2 capital. If you need one first-read ratio, start with CET1; if you need the full regulatory-capital stack, read all three together.<\/p> <p class='has-small-font-size'>Last reviewed: 2026-04-23. Regulatory schedules, thresholds, and enforcement guidance can change; verify current Call Reports and supervisory updates before citing this in a credit memo or investor document.<\/p> <p>Put plainly: CET1 = common equity, Tier 1 = CET1 + additional Tier 1, and total capital = Tier 1 + Tier 2. In this article, total capital means total risk-based capital unless stated otherwise. All three ratios use risk-weighted assets in the denominator, meaning assets are adjusted by regulatory risk weights before the ratio is calculated.<\/p> <p>The source trail starts with the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) Central Data Repository (CDR) and the reporting-form pages for FFIEC 051 and FFIEC 041 Call Reports, which are quarterly regulatory filings used by banks and bank supervisors.<sup>[1]<\/sup><sup>[2]<\/sup><sup>[3]<\/sup> Many community banks with domestic offices and total assets below $5 billion file FFIEC 051, while larger or more complex institutions may file FFIEC 041 or FFIEC 031.<\/p> <h2 class='wp-block-heading'>CET1 vs Tier 1 vs Total Capital<\/h2> <p>Schedule RC-R, the Call Report schedule for regulatory capital, puts the distinction into the regulatory form.<sup>[4]<\/sup> For a human first read, the more important point is the quality of the numerator: common equity first, then other Tier 1 capital, then Tier 2 support.<\/p> <figure class='wp-block-table'><table><thead><tr><th>Ratio<\/th><th>Plain-English numerator<\/th><th>Main question it answers<\/th><th>Main blind spot<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>CET1 ratio<\/td><td>Common equity after regulatory adjustments and deductions<\/td><td>How much core common equity supports risk-weighted assets?<\/td><td>It does not include qualifying additional Tier 1 or Tier 2 instruments.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Tier 1 capital ratio<\/td><td>CET1 plus qualifying additional Tier 1 capital<\/td><td>How much capital is available to absorb losses while the bank keeps operating?<\/td><td>It can look better than CET1 when preferred stock or other qualifying additional Tier 1 capital is material.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Total capital ratio<\/td><td>Tier 1 capital plus qualifying Tier 2 capital<\/td><td>How much total regulatory capital supports risk-weighted assets?<\/td><td>It is broader than CET1 and can include Tier 2 capital, so it is not the same quality signal.<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure> <h2 class='wp-block-heading'>What CET1 Capital Means<\/h2> <p>Common Equity Tier 1 is the narrowest of the three risk-based capital measures. Schedule RC-R starts with common stock plus related surplus, retained earnings, accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI), and CET1 minority interest, then applies regulatory adjustments and deductions before arriving at CET1 capital.<\/p> <p>The deductions matter. Schedule RC-R includes specific treatment for goodwill, certain intangible assets, deferred tax assets, mortgage servicing assets, significant investments in unconsolidated financial institutions, and deductions that fall back to CET1 when there is not enough additional Tier 1 or Tier 2 capital to absorb them.<\/p> <p>For a bank analyst, CET1 is the cleanest first read because it is closest to common ownership and retained earnings. A bank with a strong total capital ratio but thin CET1 may still have less high-quality common equity than the headline number suggests.<\/p> <h2 class='wp-block-heading'>Bank Capital Ratio Thresholds<\/h2> <p>For Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)-supervised institutions, the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) separates baseline minimums from the prompt corrective action (PCA) well-capitalized screen. The compact version is:<\/p> <figure class='wp-block-table'><table><thead><tr><th>Screen<\/th><th>CET1<\/th><th>Tier 1 capital<\/th><th>Total risk-based capital<\/th><th>Other condition<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Regulatory minimums<sup>[5]<\/sup><\/td><td>4.5%<\/td><td>6.0%<\/td><td>8.0%<\/td><td>Minimum capital rule; other buffers or requirements may also matter.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>FDIC well-capitalized PCA screen<sup>[6]<\/sup><\/td><td>6.5%<\/td><td>8.0%<\/td><td>10.0%<\/td><td>Also requires a 5.0% leverage ratio and no covered agreement, order, capital directive, or PCA directive requiring a specific capital level.<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure> <h2 class='wp-block-heading'>What Tier 1 Capital Adds<\/h2> <p>Tier 1 capital includes CET1 plus qualifying additional Tier 1 capital. In plain English, this is capital meant to absorb losses while the bank remains open and operating. That is what supervisors mean by going-concern capital. Additional Tier 1 can include qualifying noncumulative perpetual preferred stock and related surplus, along with other instruments that meet the regulatory criteria.<\/p> <p>That is why the spread between CET1 and Tier 1 is useful. If a bank reports a Tier 1 ratio materially above CET1, the next step is not to assume higher quality. The next step is to inspect the regulatory capital schedule and see whether the difference comes from additional Tier 1 instruments, minority interest, or another permitted regulatory component.<\/p> <p>The Call Report data can also create a data-quality trap. The FFIEC CDR download help says certain Schedule RC-R capital-ratio entries are stored as decimal fractions rather than percentages.<sup>[7]<\/sup> If a raw file shows 0.0950, read it as 9.50% before comparing it with a threshold.<\/p> <ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><li>Compare CET1 and Tier 1 side by side: a small gap usually means the Tier 1 stack is mostly common equity; a large gap means you should read Schedule RC-R before calling the capital base high quality.<\/li><li>Compare the current quarter with at least the prior four quarters: a falling CET1 ratio with a stable Tier 1 ratio can point to changes in common equity, deductions, retained earnings, AOCI treatment, or risk-weighted assets.<\/li><li>Compare risk-based ratios with the leverage ratio: risk weighting can make a balance sheet look different from a simple Tier 1-to-average-assets measure.<\/li><\/ul> <p>The Community Bank Leverage Ratio (CBLR) framework is another caveat. CBLR is a simpler leverage-based capital option for qualifying smaller banks that meet asset, trading, and off-balance-sheet limits and generally maintain a leverage ratio above 9.0%. If a small bank elected CBLR treatment, do not treat a missing full risk-based capital stack the same way you would for a non-CBLR filer.<\/p> <h2 class='wp-block-heading'>What Total Risk-Based Capital Adds<\/h2> <p>Total risk-based capital is broader because it adds Tier 2 capital to Tier 1 capital. In the Call Report, total capital is built from Tier 1 capital plus eligible Tier 2 capital.<\/p> <p>Tier 2 can include qualifying subordinated debt, limited-life preferred stock, qualifying capital minority interest, and adjusted allowances for credit losses (AACL), subject to the detailed Schedule RC-R rules. The instructions cap includable AACL, so allowance support does not flow into Tier 2 without limit.<\/p> <p>That cap is one reason total capital should not be read as the same quality as CET1. A higher total capital ratio may be useful, especially in a credit-loss scenario, but it can be supported by instruments and allowances that sit below common equity in the regulatory capital stack.<\/p> <p>For sponsor-bank diligence, the practical question is not which ratio is highest. The question is whether the strongest-looking ratio depends on capital layers that are less directly tied to common equity and retained earnings.<\/p> <h2 class='wp-block-heading'>Which Bank Capital Ratio Matters Most?<\/h2> <p>Use the three ratios as a sequence, not as substitutes. Start with CET1 for common-equity quality, use Tier 1 to identify additional loss-absorbing capital while the bank is still operating, and use total capital to see how much Tier 2 support is being added.<\/p> <p>For a threshold test, use illustrative ratios: 6.4% CET1, 8.3% Tier 1, and 10.9% total capital. That bank does not meet the FDIC well-capitalized screen because CET1 is below 6.5%, even though total capital is above 10.0%. The lowest relevant ratio controls the conclusion.<\/p> <h2 class='wp-block-heading'>How to Verify These Ratios in Call Reports<\/h2> <p>The fastest verification path is to confirm the legal bank first, then trace the ratio back to the Call Report schedule instead of relying on a standalone headline number.<\/p> <figure class='wp-block-table'><table><thead><tr><th>Step<\/th><th>What to pull<\/th><th>Decision rule<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>1<\/td><td>Confirm the institution in FDIC BankFind or the FFIEC institution lookup.<sup>[8]<\/sup><\/td><td>Make sure you are reviewing the right legal bank, not only a fintech program name or holding-company brand.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>2<\/td><td>Pull CET1, Tier 1, and total capital ratios from Schedule RC-R, Part I.<\/td><td>Convert raw CDR decimals to percentages before comparing ratios.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>3<\/td><td>Compare the ratios with the threshold table above when the FDIC rule is the right reference.<\/td><td>Do not let a strong total capital ratio hide a CET1 miss.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4<\/td><td>Open the standardized total risk-weighted assets line in Schedule RC-R, Part II.<\/td><td>A ratio can change because the numerator moved, the denominator moved, or both moved.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>5<\/td><td>Review related Call Report schedules for loans, past-due and nonaccrual assets, charge-offs and recoveries, allowances, deposits, deposit-insurance assessment data, and average balances.<\/td><td>Capital is a buffer; the asset, funding, and earnings profile tells you what the buffer is protecting against.<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure> <p>If you want to apply this screen across peers, use the Deep Digital Ventures <a href='https:\/\/banking.deepdigitalventures.com\/'>bank peer comparison tool for capital ratios<\/a> to line up CET1, Tier 1, and total capital against banks with similar asset size, loan mix, and deposit profile. Then use the <a href='https:\/\/banking.deepdigitalventures.com\/'>public bank data context view for Call Report schedules<\/a> to trace the ratio back to source filings.<\/p> <h2 class='wp-block-heading'>What Capital Ratios Do Not Tell You<\/h2> <p>Capital ratios are necessary but not enough. Third-party oversight, enforcement history, deposit concentration, Bank Secrecy Act and anti-money-laundering (BSA\/AML) controls, and commercial real estate (CRE) concentration can still justify deeper review. The interagency third-party-risk guidance and CRE concentration guidance are better used as separate diligence overlays than as part of the ratio definition.<sup>[9]<\/sup><sup>[10]<\/sup><\/p> <p>The clean decision rule is this: cite CET1 when you mean common-equity quality, cite Tier 1 when you mean going-concern regulatory capital, and cite total risk-based capital only when you are comfortable including Tier 2 capital in the claim.<\/p> <h2 class='wp-block-heading'>FAQ<\/h2> <h3 class='wp-block-heading'>Is CET1 always the most important ratio?<\/h3> <p>CET1 is usually the best starting point because it focuses on common equity after deductions. It is not the only ratio to read, but it is the ratio most likely to expose whether a capital claim is backed by the highest-quality layer of regulatory capital.<\/p> <h3 class='wp-block-heading'>Can a bank be well capitalized if one ratio misses the threshold?<\/h3> <p>Under the FDIC PCA rule, the well-capitalized category requires meeting the listed total risk-based, Tier 1, CET1, and leverage thresholds, plus the order-related condition in the rule. A single miss can change the conclusion.<\/p> <h3 class='wp-block-heading'>Why can total capital look stronger than CET1?<\/h3> <p>Total capital includes Tier 1 capital plus qualifying Tier 2 capital. Because Tier 2 can include instruments and allowances that are not common equity, the total capital ratio can be higher without giving the same quality signal as CET1.<\/p> <h3 class='wp-block-heading'>Where should an analyst verify the numbers?<\/h3> <p>Verify the institution in FDIC BankFind, pull Call Report data from the FFIEC CDR, and read Schedule RC-R Part I and Part II in the FFIEC instructions. For enforcement overlays, check the FDIC, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), and Federal Reserve enforcement-action pages for the relevant institution and supervisor.<\/p> <h2 class='wp-block-heading'>Sources<\/h2> <ol class=\"wp-block-list\"><li>[1] FFIEC Central Data Repository &#8211; public Call Report search and download source: https:\/\/cdr.ffiec.gov\/public\/<\/li><li>[2] FFIEC 051 reporting form page &#8211; current form page for many eligible community banks: https:\/\/www.ffiec.gov\/resources\/reporting-forms\/ffiec051<\/li><li>[3] FFIEC 041 reporting form page &#8211; current form page for larger domestic banks: https:\/\/www.ffiec.gov\/resources\/reporting-forms\/ffiec041<\/li><li>[4] FDIC-hosted FFIEC 031\/041 Schedule RC-R instructions &#8211; regulatory-capital schedule instructions: https:\/\/www.fdic.gov\/resources\/bankers\/call-reports\/crinst-031-041\/2024\/031-041-324-rc-r-part-i.pdf<\/li><li>[5] 12 CFR 324.10 &#8211; minimum capital requirements for FDIC-supervised institutions: https:\/\/www.ecfr.gov\/current\/title-12\/part-324\/section-324.10<\/li><li>[6] 12 CFR 324.403 &#8211; FDIC prompt corrective action capital categories: https:\/\/www.ecfr.gov\/current\/title-12\/part-324\/section-324.403<\/li><li>[7] FFIEC CDR download help &#8211; note on ratio fields stored as decimal fractions: https:\/\/cdr.ffiec.gov\/public\/HelpFiles\/DownloadHelp.htm<\/li><li>[8] FDIC BankFind &#8211; legal-bank lookup for institution verification: https:\/\/banks.data.fdic.gov\/bankfind-suite\/bankfind<\/li><li>[9] June 2023 Interagency Guidance on Third-Party Relationships: Risk Management &#8211; sponsor-bank diligence overlay: https:\/\/www.fdic.gov\/news\/financial-institution-letters\/2023\/fil23029.html<\/li><li>[10] December 2006 Interagency CRE Concentration Guidance &#8211; supervisory screening criteria for commercial real estate concentration: https:\/\/www.occ.gov\/news-issuances\/bulletins\/2006\/bulletin-2006-46.html<\/li><\/ol>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Understand the practical difference between CET1, Tier 1, and total risk-based capital in bank regulatory data.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":1965,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"CET1 vs Tier 1 vs Total Capital: Key Differences","_seopress_titles_desc":"Compare CET1, Tier 1, and total risk-based capital, see FDIC thresholds, and learn how to verify bank capital ratios in Call Reports.","_seopress_robots_index":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1263","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-regulatory-data"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/banking.deepdigitalventures.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1263","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/banking.deepdigitalventures.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/banking.deepdigitalventures.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/banking.deepdigitalventures.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/banking.deepdigitalventures.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1263"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/banking.deepdigitalventures.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1263\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2168,"href":"https:\/\/banking.deepdigitalventures.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1263\/revisions\/2168"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/banking.deepdigitalventures.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1965"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/banking.deepdigitalventures.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1263"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/banking.deepdigitalventures.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1263"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/banking.deepdigitalventures.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1263"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}